(Photo:the Malaysian Insider)
They say a picture says a thousand words. This photo certainly speaks volume about PM Abdullah’s current dilemma. Much that his supporters would like to argue otherwise, PM Abdullah’s fate is almost sealed. Yes, almost, not there yet but looks inevitable. It is no longer a question of when but how to bow out gracefully.
So, the question now is how people would remember PAK LAH or to be precise his legacy? I once wrote a posting here on the possibilities that he be remembered as the Father of Democratization of Malaysia.( Pak Lah as bapa pendemokrasian malaysia) But that was months ago. May be time has come for the people to really assess Pak Lah’s legacy.
Make no mistake about it. Some would still remember PaK Lah as Mr. Nice Guy/Mr. Clean and the PM that won an unprecedented landslide victory for BN in 2004 General Election. Yet, most would remember him as Mr. Flip-Flopping and the PM that created history by losing 5 state governments and 2/3 majority in Dewan Rakyat to the opposition.
However, things could have been different. Had he lived up to so many of his promises of long overdue reforms since 2004, more so after the 308 political tsunami. And Yes, history would have been different, if he had sticked to his own rigorous reform script and not yet another round of UMNO warlords-pleasing for the past few months.
Story had it that ” a couple of days after the March 8 general elections, a calm Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi sat down with some supporters and his inner circle in Sri Perdana to survey the new political landscape and weigh the prime minister’s options going forward.
Those familiar with the meeting recalled that a confetti of ideas were tossed around on how to regain the initiative from the Anwar Ibrahim-led opposition and to hold off Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and other critics within Umno baying for Abdullah’s blood.
One idea got some traction – the notion that Abdullah had to throw caution to the wind and reform the various institutions in the country.
He had to care less of what his party thought and focus solely on what Malaysians wanted. If he followed this strategy, he would be so popular with Malaysians that his party will not dare to move against him.
Even the downside was attractive – the idea that he would be remembered as a Malaysian Mikhail Gorbachev who lost his power and position doing the right thing.
That seems like sound advice which Abdullah should have followed.
Instead, after appointing Datuk Zaid Ibrahim as the de facto law minister and making some loud noises about reforms, he retreated to his usual patch, worried that he was upsetting the Umno warlords. ”
(more please read: If the PM had only thrown away caution, not chances….)
As they also say the rest now is history. And what would be your honest judgment of the 5th Malaysian Prime Minister, Pak Lah’s legacy?